January 23-26, 2003
Super Bowl Sunday. It's half-time and I see a
pattern. The best games, like last year and the one three years ago,
are when the two teams don't have the best defenses. Tampa Bay this
year and Baltimore two years ago had the league's best defenses and
in the pressure cooker of the Super Bowl, these defenses are
stifling. Maybe there is a truism there. It seems that under intense
pressure it is easier to defend than to attack.
Well, the game followed the first half although
Oakland did have an abortive comeback attempt that the Tampa Defense
succeeded in smothering.
The stats tell the story. Seven of eight times
previously the best defense has faced the best offense, the defense
has won. Now make it eight out of nine.
Daughters. My daughter came over for dinner
last night and brought a movie she wanted me watch. It is called "A
Walk To Remember" and it she cried through most of the second half.
She wanted my opinion.
I had to look at the cover to see if this was
really made by Hollywood. It was. Warner Brothers made it, but it
was decidedly un-Hollywood like. The movie was different than most
modern "love" stories in that the characters were not obsessed with
sex and the most provocative thing that happens is a kiss. The
language is mostly clean, though there are crude allusions at times.
The biggest difference is that there is a girl who has a strong
Christian faith and it is presented fairly. Though the story line
has her ridiculed for her beliefs, the film itself doesn't make fun
of her or trivialize her faith. I found that refreshing.
I could see why my daughter liked the film. As a
believer herself, here was a film that portrayed the decision to
stand your ground as a positive thing that still allows dreams to be
realized.
Irregularity. It is more
than a plumbing condition, often it is also a creative and
intellectual condition. Writers have called it a bloc, the missing
muse, and a number of other things over the years. My excuse was
that I finally asked myself why I was doing this. I have never been
a journal keeper, more of a anecdote writer, which by its nature is
incident or impulse driven. Not being sure of why I was putting all
this energy into these ruminations, I lost the energy to continue.
I decided if I wasn't doing it for me then I
couldn't continue to do it. Other, external motives don't keep me
going in anything I do for very long. It was a hard lesson to learn.
We all do things for so many reasons, to please so many people,
alive or ghosts, present or absent, that we are not always sure of what
our real reasons are. I guess if I am going to continue to do this,
I will have to do it for me. It is the only way to sustain it. I
want to be successful (which to means I write well whatever I write)
and if I don't take personal pleasure in creating these objects of
wordplay, then all the external encourage won't sustain it. Oh, it
might cause it to flower for a brief period, but without the engine of
personal motivation, it will wither and die forthwith.
Another thing I discovered was that while I can
write about almost anything that strikes my interest, politics,
social situations, etc., what I really care to write about is my
faith and my life as a result of that faith. I guess that means I
would be considered a "religious" writer. So be it. It is what I am.
It is why I changed the subtitle above to include the search for
faith. It's me. No apologies offered. Along that line, there are new
postings in
religious studies.
So, we will see what happens.