By date
Go to By topicsAll items
Copyright 2003-2004 William Meisheid
6-15-04
We the people - In Ronald Reagan's first inaugural
address, Tuesday, January 20, 1981 he stated a fundamental truth,
"All of us need to be reminded that the Federal Government did not
create the States; the States created the Federal Government...We
are a nation that has a government--not the other way around." In
our ongoing move to centralized control, confronted primarily by Reagan
as President, we
sometimes forget that the United States Constitution starts out "We
the people" reminding us that the foundation of the American
political experiment is in the consent of the governed.
This consent of the governed is not just the
foundation of the United States, it is the foundation of the
Christian Church. The Church was created by God for his people, not
his people for the Church. Without their consent the Church ceases
to exist, it is only a minister preaching to himself in a
whitewashed sepulcher.
For the United States to exist its people must
submit to moral commitments and to the rule of law. Their commitment
to government, to the state is only in the service to that morality
and law. Likewise for the Christian Church to exist the people of
God must submit to Jesus Christ, to the sanctification of their
souls for the sake of holiness. Their commitment to the Church, to
their denominations and leadership is only in service to Christ and
his holiness. If the "Church" is no longer in service to Christ and
his holiness then the people of God must no longer submit to it, to
their denominations and leadership. They must come out of Babylon
and abandon the harlot as the Church left the synagogue and the
Jewish leadership that rejected the messiahship of Jesus Christ, and
as those in the third and fourth centuries left the Arian Bishops
and their leadership, who denied the Trinity, for the orthodox
faith.
When you stand before Jesus Christ on the day of
judgment, he will not ask you what the Church said and did, what
your denomination said and did; he will look into your heart to see
what you said and did. Therefore the goal of all Christians should
be to adhere to the words of
Jeremiah, "ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is,
and walk in it, and you will find rest for your souls." (Jer. 6:16b)
6-15-02
6-10-04
Know - Knowing and being known are
something Christians, in opposition to the current existential and
deconstructionist worldview, take for granted. There is a
fundamental assumption every Christian makes: God is knowable; He
has revealed Himself both by revelation, as recorded in the sacred
Biblical text, and in the flesh of His only-begotten Son, Jesus
Christ. There is a problem, however, with that religious assumption.
Rarely do Christians make the required effort to really know the God
who has made Himself known. There are many reasons for this, not the
least of which is the effort involved. Couple that with the awesome
responsibility of coming that close to the creator of not just the
universe, but of one's self, the One who
knows even the number of hairs on my head (a constantly
diminishing number in my case...) and you can understand at least
some of the reticence. However, since God has always demanded that
His people love Him with
their whole heart, mind, and soul, failure to "know" Him is in
essence a failure to love Him, since how can one truly love what one
does not know.
One book in the history of Christian writings has
successfully addressed this problem, so much so that after 31 years
it is still a best seller for
Inter
Varsity Press. That book is
Knowing
God by J.I. Packer. This week I begin a study of this
seminal book with the men's study group at Emmaus Anglican Church.
While you may not be able to physically join us I invite anyone
reading this to follow along with our study. Lessons will be posted
each week, along with answers to the study question on the week
following the actual study. You will need a copy of the book to join
in with our study. You can order from
my link
(I get 6% to help defray the cost of this Web site, but it costs you
no more) or if you cannot afford it,
let me know and I will have a copy sent to you.
I would challenge any Christian reading this to
make an honest effort to "know" their God. If not, why are you a
Christian in the first place? 6-10-04
5-21-04
Slippery Slope - I got into this
discussion by reading and posting to a blog, but then I decided the
idea was worth expanding, so here goes. The nature of the slippery
slope argument is that once one thing is done it is easier to do the
next thing. Those who care about these things say that while it can
be argued that this might be true for individual moral (or amoral)
decisions, in which the effects of the current decision on future
decisions and their justification process must be considered, it
does not apply ipso facto to situations of law. That said, in our
current fluid legal climate, in which activism prevails and legal
arguments are primarily the search for loopholes or some tortured
means to support the desired outcome, I no longer think that is
true.
Laws, constitutions, etc. are like contracts and
contracts are properly adjudicated by examining the intent of the
creating parties, since it is impossible to overtly state absolutely
every possibility in an absolute sense, much less cover every
contingency. So, you deal with the unknown by referencing the known
along with the intent at its formulation. The problem with law today
is that its deliberative process has been removed from this
cognitive framework. As a result, things like the contract between
the state and its citizens, as well as its citizens with each other,
evidenced by things like the constitutions that govern our
social/political/governmental existence, no longer are judged by
original intent as a fundamental principal of interpretation.
The logical progression (or slippery slope –
circular pun intended) of this type of legal governance is the
eventual debasement of the contract and the loss of meaning of the
plain and simple. What is even worse is that we lose all security of
knowing what was originally agreed upon. As a result the court in
Massachusetts can say that since the original framers of their
constitution as well as the citizens who ratified it did not define
the meaning of marriage as limited to be between a man and a woman,
it doesn't mean that, regardless of intent or assumed framework of
the writers and ratifiers. In doing this the court not only denies
original intent, they make the words of the constitution plastic and
meaningless, destroying the contract made between those citizens,
the government, and the constitution they ratified. Everyone who was
part of the process knew what marriage meant and didn't mean when
the constitution was ratified. It was an institution as old as
mankind and didn't need clarification. No matter, original intent
and understanding no longer apply.
If the normative process of law and interpretation
supported this type of oxymoronic activity then why have an
amendment process? Even if the original parties to a contract change
their mind about how it should be interpreted, they can't just do
that without documentation for later adjudication. They change it;
they amend it; they write codicils, because change has to be
documented and agreed upon or there is no basis for later
interpretation in case of conflict or by a third party. It appears
that we no longer do that at any level in our legal system, so it
seems to me that the slippery slope is inevitable in everything,
including the law and in this case is opening the door to just about
anything being called marriage, including polygamy or any union of
convenience, if for no other reason than venial tax considerations.
I know there are many who call this argument absurd, but on what
unchanging basis do they make that statement when everything is
changing underneath their feet. When the Hebrew prophet Hosea said
""They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind" he was making the
ultimate slippery slope argument. It appears there are a lot of
whirlwinds on the horizon. 5-21-04
5-3-04
Respect - The simple dictionary definition is
1. To feel or show deferential regard for; esteem. 2. To avoid
violation of or interference with. In relation to the recent
revelations of U.S. abuse of Iraqi prisoners, the second definition
should apply, specifically "to avoid violation of." The corollary to
showing respect is acting with honor or specifically "A code of
integrity, dignity, and pride, chiefly among men, that was
maintained in some societies."
War in the technological era lacked both respect
and honor in the treatment of prisoners which forced nations to sign
and swear to follow the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment
of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21,
1950. Who can forget the Japanese and German treatment of prisoners
during World War II. The U.S. is a signatory to that convention and
as such bears responsibility for its treatment of Iraqis in its
custody.
However, war is not the only place, merely the
most extreme example of men struggling to act with honor and respect
to those they consider enemies and it is not just on the battlefield
where we fail to meet the test. Our current political discourse
appears to identify "the other" as enemies, not as opponents or
those we just disagree with. While this has been an historic problem
in politics, the current politicization of almost every aspect of
our national life seems to have broken down the remnants of honor
and respect within our society as a whole, making debasement of the
opponent the chief goal of any interaction. Too sad by far.
Abuse in Iraq stands beside an ongoing climate of
political abuse of opponents as coming from the same wellspring,
separated only by degree, not context. Since both respect and honor
require character and moral convictions, it comes as no surprise to
me that as the Judeo/Christian religious foundations of our social
contract are removed from developmental influence and marginalized
in the public and political arena, replaced by secularism and its
subjective and utilitarian view on all things, we see the social
fabric unravel and atrocities become acceptable until caught. Common
decency, respect, and acting with honor is what Christianity brought
to Western Civilization and they are dying as it fades into memory.
These revelations are not an aberration but the early signs of what
is coming. When you sow the wind the whirlwind eventually comes
round. 5-7-04
4-29-04
Aspirations - While human aspirations are generally
looked upon as a good thing (we all need aspirations it is said), if
Robert L. Park, author of
Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud, is correct,
most of our aspirations open us up to cons and thievery. Park noted,
"It seems to me that people want two things: one, to live forever;
and two, to do no work." Since no one, except maybe the severely
depressed, wants to die, people become marks for all sorts of cons
offering life extension, and in the religious sphere, eternal life,
usually for a price. Combine that desire with wanting to do no work
and you have a potent draw in which a unique pill, formulation, or
religious system will solve all your problems without you having to
barely lift a finger. Christians are not immune from this scenario
and in many ways the downward spiral of the Episcopal Church is a
prime example.
Having abandoned the "no pain, no gain" principle
of Christian growth and discipleship, the Episcopal Church,
especially through its con men Bishops such as Jack Spong, a
disciple of the late and unlamented James Pike, has offered a gullible
and biblically naive Church cost-free
discipleship and sin-free salvation, along with the siren song of
the human potential movement. Why work through the pain of
repentance and sanctification, struggling to reign in your appetites
and baser sexual impulses when these wolves in sheep's clothing say
go for it with gusto?
Thad Barnum, AMiA Bishop for Emmaus Anglican
Church, preached a sermon on January 16th at the annual AMiA Winter
Conference on the difference between Straight Street and Broadway,
between salvation in Jesus Christ and damnation in self-delusion by
taking the easy road to perdition. It hit the issue and men like
Spong right between the eyes and has caused many a hearer to
"examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test
yourselves."
2 Cor. 13:5. Indeed we should examine ourselves, our
aspirations, and anything that might separate us from the love of
Jesus Christ, doing everything we can to make our way to Straight
Street, the only pathway to salvation so we can enter the narrow
gate. Now that is one aspiration that God can honor. 4-29-04
4-20-04
Retrosexual - Someone who believes in the
retro idea that Biblical sexuality and morality is the right
approach to sexual identity and sexual activity. In this age of mega
sexual discovery,
Joseph Farah of WND waded through all of the various new sexual
identities (homosexuals, bisexuals, lesbians, transsexuals,
transgendereds, metrosexuals, and whatever else is out there) and
decided nothing quite fit him. After some reflection he decided he
was a retrosexual, a biblical and traditional male reared in the
feminine honoring tradition of Western Civilization (somewhat in
line with Mark Simpson's
coining of the term). Count me in, in spades.
Having said that, upon my own reflection I
discovered it was time for me to reexamine my commitment to the
newly identified retrosexual lifestyle--not an easy task. It means
taking responsibility for being the provider of my family, of
considering my wife worthy of the supreme sacrifice and all of the
little sacrifices leading up to that (he who is faithful in
little...), of treating my wife, my daughter, and indeed all women
with the utmost dignity and respect. In short, it means being both
reliable and accountable. No wonder retrosexuality is not popular in
our culture.
No matter. What is right is right and if you want
to be tight with God, slackers need not apply. He expects total
commitment. So, it is time to measure up. If you think you might be
a retrosexual, then I challenge you to measure up also. To make a
pun on the old Army commercial, "Get tight with God and be all you
can be". It appears that promise keepers was onto something. 4-20-04
3-24-04
Habit - ''We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is
not an act, but a habit.'' Aristotle was on to something there. I
now understand those relentless drills we did in Catholic school to
learn things like the common prepositions or arithmetic formulas. To
this day I remember how to find the volume of a cylinder
(pr2h),
among many other things. Aristotle also gives me insight into Paul's
statement in Philippians 4:8 "Finally, brothers, whatever is true,
whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is
lovely, whatever is admirable--if anything is excellent or
praiseworthy--think about such things." Habits are acts of will or
accident, solidified over time. They can be bringers of good or ill.
Without them sports, driving your car, even typing this essay would
not exist. Combine Aristotle and Paul and you get decent people.
Isn't that what we want to be, want our children to be, want our
society to be. I guess there was something to be said for manners
after all. 03-24-04
3-22-04
Mausoleums - They look good on the outside, but inside it is
all death and decay. Jesus called the Pharisees of his day "whited
sepulchers/whitewashed tombs", saying these teachers of the law were
like mausoleums, looking good on the outside while inwardly holding
only uncleanness and death. There are those that feel much of
Christianity has become nothing but mausoleums, edifices that have
lost power of the Holy Spirit and the newness of life in Jesus
Christ. Just don't look beneath the surface because there is nothing
there. This is a serious problem beyond the Christian community. As the growing Muslim tide confronts
a weakened Christianity on almost
every front, who will stand for Christ and the uniqueness of his
salvation claims? Where will the energy and zeal come from to meet this
extremely serious threat? Who will answer the call of the watchman;
who is willing to stand in the gap?
These are serious and perilous times indeed. 3-22-04
3-17-04
Aboutness - In thinking about the
atheist's ability to produce a cogent moral system, along with a
system of "rights" I discovered a secondary problem is how do they
arrive at the "aboutness" of what it means to be human? I work in
the information technology industry and one of the hot topics these
days is metadata or the exposed or named properties that give the
"aboutness" of the information object. Someone has to make cognitive
external assessments in order to analyze and assign these
understandings.
After some reflection I realized that these two
issues intersect and create a fundamental problem for
atheists/agnostics, and that is, if you only have an internal frame
of reference and there is no external assignation of "rights" and
"aboutness", then where does it all come from? If the rights and
aboutness only come out of the internal human dialog, then they are
totally subjective and malleable and cannot produce anything
inalienable.
In the end, looking at history, we as a country, as
a social and political system, only exist because our forbearers lived
and moved and breathed in the ether of Christendom, with its
fundamental dignity of man and God-given rights, inalienable rights.
Atheists could not have produced that. On the contrary, they owe their
intellectual and moral framework to us who created the ether in which
they swim.
That is at least how I see it. 03-17-04
3-3-04
Context - I was watching
O'Reilly
the other night and he was discussing reactions to Mel Gibson's
film,
The Passion of the Christ. I heard for the umpteenth time the
tired and felicitous argument "But I know some atheists who are good
moral people, blah, blah, blah." That statement is useless without
context and the significant context is that those people that Bill
knows, and any others like them, have grown up in the context of a
society built upon the moral foundation of Judeo-Christian Western
Civilization. They did not grow up in a vacuum and develop their
"good moral" underpinnings out of nothing. They inherited the moral
structure of our religiously founded and sustained civilization
(though how much longer is anyone's guess). While they reject the
theistic foundations and the common Christian beliefs that created
the water in which they swim, they owe their morality to its
conscious and unconscious instruction. There is no way around this
fact. Remove the religious underpinnings from our society and you
have nothing to replace it. The moral relativism you are left with
is not a replacement but a mere bow to expediency and one step
removed from the rule of fang and claw, and still is dependent on
the inherited wisdom of the religious moral systems that inform any
moral efforts. Besides, without deity bestowing "inalienable
rights", there are no inherent or fundamental rights and power,
wants, and desires rule the day. Ask the survivors of Pol Pot and
the return to "Year Zero" in Cambodia or any of the other historic
attempts to remove the influence of religion from the heart of man
and society. Atheist and agnostics successfully survive only because
of their symbiotic relationship to the religiously structured
societies in which they live. They are parasites, incapable of
sustaining social structures on their own, despite their
protestations and it is time they faced up to the fact. 3-3-04
2-23-04
Deicide - No, I am not referring to the
heavy metal/death metal band Deicide (though they are
defiantly anti-Christian and into deicide in a big way), but the
problem of blaming the Jews throughout history for killing Jesus
Christ. Since Jesus is God incarnate to Christians, those who killed
him are guilty of deicide. Despite the fact that historic Christian
theology has laid the death of Jesus at the feet of the sin of every
human being, the Jews and the Jewish leaders of the day were the
physical agents of his condemnation, and the Romans through Pilate
the tool to carry it out. That fact is only disputed by those who
play games with the facts and cannot admit the obvious. However, it
is VERY IMPORTANT to note that the guilt died with those who
participated in the event, a guilt that was further expiated in 70
AD by the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans. No Jew of the
second century, much less any Jew of the twentieth or twenty-first
century bears any guilt for what happened on Golgotha two thousand
years ago. None. Nada. At least not any more guilt than any human
being guilty of sin bears. Not any more guilt than you or me. So
let's give it a rest.
For a more nuanced look at this issue read my
Who Killed Jesus? article. 2-23-04
2-18-04
Lent - The Christian liturgical period of
Lent is one week away, and this year it arrives amidst the
controversy surrounding the release of Mel Gibson's seminal film,
The Passion of the Christ, which even its critics admit is
an exceptionally powerful movie.
Traditionally, Lent's purpose, according to the Catholic
Encyclopedia was, “...above all else, to prepare men for the
celebration of the death and Resurrection of Christ…the better the
preparation the more effective the celebration will be." In
observing 40 days to match Christ's preparatory 40 days in the
wilderness, we prepare ourselves for the rigors of Holy Week and the
joy of Easter. Its official observance dates to 360 AD and the
Council of Loadicea. Its emphasis was on the spiritual renewal that
the preparation for Easter demanded. For many Lent has become the
season for penance, for sorrow for sin and rededication of one's
life to God through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Lent has its many
detractors, with some trying to trace it back to the period of
preparation for the Babylonian "Feast
of Tammuz", which took place in June, and celebrated a pagan
"messiah" of sorts.
However, for
liturgical Christians, Lent holds the possibility of being a fertile
time of reflection and self examination, of repentance and renewal,
a time to be tested, as Christ was tested, and like Christ a time to
resist the influence of the Devil in our lives. With a properly
prepared heart, it can be a spiritually significant time, an
extended pilgrimage of the soul that takes up the challenge of Psalm
51:17, "The sacrifice you want is a broken spirit. A broken and
repentant heart, O God, you will not despise."
I am looking
forward to Lent this year, to its rigors, its demands, and yes, to
Mel Gibson's movie, since I hope to use that movie to remind my soul
in a graphic way of the enormity of Christ's sacrifice for me and my
sin. I pray that God uses this Lent to draw me ever closer to
himself and I pray the same prayer for you. May God grant all of us
our heart's desire. 2-18-04
2-13-04
Love - As we
approach the romantic Valentine's Day holiday, our thoughts drift to
love, and due to the nature of our social discourse, to love for our
significant other, whether wife or husband, or boyfriend or
girlfriend. However, while the culture centers on eros and the
erotic nature of loving relationships, we as Christians should be
focusing on agape and the sacrificial nature of our loving
relationships. God has an interesting economy when it comes to agape
and commitment. Jesus said whatever relationships you give up to
follow him (a true act of sacrificial agape), then you should expect
to get back more than you gave up (see
Luke 18:29-32), a sort of endlessly bubbling up reservoir of
love for those in Christ. Now that is one promise in scripture that
we should examine more closely, especially on Valentine's Day.
2-13-04
2-9-04
Compromise - Sometimes compromise is a
good thing, as we seek the middle ground in a demanding situation.
However, in situations touching on truth and especially on the truth
of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, compromise is the stuff of
syncretism, of a tacit denial of the faith once delivered unto the
saints. In his February 5th Breakpoint Commentary,
As Long as We Get Along: Selling the Truth for Unity, Chuck
Colson lays bare the syncretism, in the name of unity, of our
compromising age.
Episcopal Bishop Peter James Lee of Northern
Virginia, in an effort to address the mounting dissatisfaction of
conservatives in his diocese over the ordination of Gene Robinson, a
practicing homosexual, as Bishop of New Hampshire, called upon those
at his diocesan convention not to split the church. He said to those
gathered, "If you must make a choice between heresy and schism,
always choose heresy.” Chuck Colson sees Bishop James' words as a
wake-up call to all conservative Christians and evangelicals, not
just to Episcopalians.
I say thank you God for such frankness by the
enemies of the faith, for no clearer distinction can be made than
that. In making that statement, Bishop Lee admits to heresy and that
Robinson's consecration advanced heretical doctrine. I am not sure
if that was his intention, but I thank him for his clarity.
Uncountable numbers of Christians over the history of the church
have given their lives rather than bow their knee to Baal and
acquiesce to heresy. During periods of extreme trial God has raised
up men like Athenasius and Luther, Cramner and Wesley, and many
others, some known and many unknown to history, to fight the good
fight for the faith once delivered to saints.
With their sacrifices before us, it is time for
all of us to accept the call, to be God's voice within our areas of
influence, to stand for truth and the integrity of God's demands on
our lives. I thank God that Lent is only weeks away and that Mel
Gibson's movie about the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ,
The Passion of the Christ, opens on Ash Wednesday. May God use
this movie and the upcoming period of Lent to gird up the loins of
His Church and prepare them to stand as one for His Truth. May we
never accept heresy to avoid schism, either in our churches or in
our own lives. To God be the Glory, now and forever. Amen. 2-09-04
2-2-04
Pushing the Envelope - Janet Jackson's
"exposure" at the Super Bowl half-time show, culminated what FCC
Chairman Michael K. Powell called a "whole performance [that] was
onstage copulation." The backlash and outrage has rightfully begun.
There is a symmetry to recent events. The Episcopal Church
consecrates a Sodomite Bishop and is surprised at the backlash,
first thinking it will die down and now realizing it is escalating
against them. MTV brings its amoral sexual hedonism into public
living rooms, not on its depraved TV network, but at the world's
most celebrated family and friends event and it is surprised at the
backlash, first thinking a simple disavowal will be enough, but now
is realizing it is escalating out of control against them, as well
as against CBS and their parent company Viacom. Seminal symmetry,
two events linked by presumption and depravity, both causing an
unexpectedly fierce reaction. Only God knows where it will go from
here, but European laughter at our "prudish" reaction to what they
see is no big deal demonstrates again how different our once similar
cultures have become. Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean,
who said in response to FCC reaction "I find that to be a bit of a
flap about nothing," may have finally gone over a line he cannot
return from, as it shows how completely out of touch he is with the
core of American values. We appear to have reached a "tipping point"
in the culture wars. Which way will it fall? 2-2-04
1-27-04
Bible Study - Like carbohydrates, Bible
study comes in two basic varieties: simple and complex. Simple carbs
include sugars and starches, the things known to cause flabby weight
gain and numerous health problems when we eat them as our regular
fare. They are easy to like, hard to stop, and invariably
destructive. Simple Bible studies, like simple carbs, are easy to
enjoy, giving you a quick sense of satisfaction, but tend to become
addictive. In the long run however, simple Bible studies are not
good for you because they fill you will the illusion that you are
doing something significant when you are not. This is the problem
Paul discusses in Hebrews 5:11-6:3. Complex carbs are digested more
slowly, have a much higher nutritional value, and tend to provide
balanced energy throughout the day while fostering much better
health. Likewise, in-depth Bible study moves slowly and delves
deeper into the truths of God as well as our own strengths and
limitations. In-depth study is as necessary to grow spiritually
mature as complex carbs are needed to help you maintain health and
vigor. There is nothing wrong with a simple study now and then, just
like simple carbs taken in moderation won't seriously hurt your
health. But without including complex Bible study in our spiritual
lives, we are headed for trouble, just like the absence of complex
carbs would hurt our health. Protect your health and your spiritual
life by watching what you eat and how you study. 1-27-04
1-20-04
Politically Correct Persecution - WorldNet
Daily reports a
story that shows the political correctness of Europe exceeds
even that of the United States, so much so that the following
statement, in a parish letter to his congregation, caused a French
Catholic priest to be found guilty and fined for "provoking
discrimination, hatred or violence."
"The Asiatics proliferate and invade our land,
bringing with them an ideology that threatens the whole world,"
"Indeed I would add there is no such thing as
'moderate' Islam. All the populations infected by the Muslim
religion are indoctrinated by the Quran – a holy book which is the
manual for the extension of the kingdom of the devil at the
expense of the kingdom of Christ."
The article fails to say which part of his statement
was the offending verbiage. The good father's assertion, however, that
the Quran is the manual for the extension of the kingdom of the devil
at the expense of the kingdom of Christ is true, as it is true for all
of the holy books of all religions outside of the Jewish/Christian
scriptures. If Christ be true, all others are liars and fronts for
Satanic deception and fall under Paul's prohibition in Galatians 1:8-9
"But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other
than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! As we
have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you
a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally
condemned!" The truth only unites those who believe; it divides all
others. 1-20-04
1-19-04
Dreams - Today is Martin Luther King Jr.
Day. Leaving aside the continuing arguments about the validity of
the holiday, one that thing that continues to get lost in the noise
of the occasion is the central tenant of King's philosophy, the crux
of his "I
have a dream" speech: that he wanted America to be a color-blind
society, without privileged classes, with a level playing field for
everyone. Three passages from that speech emphasis this basic
premise (emphasis added).
I have a dream that one day this nation will
rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these
truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of
Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave
owners will be able to sit down together at the table of
brotherhood.
I have a dream that my four little children will
one day live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the color of their skin but by the content
of their character.
With those statements as a foundation, it is toxic
to both the character and hopes of a nation to build into law and
its social structure a system of preferences for anyone, since once
established, not only are they nigh unto impossible to extricate,
they are fundamentally destructive to the goals they claim to
foster. They create a sense of entitlement where non should exist in
a society of equally created persons. They substitute one prejudice
for another, one evil for another.
We should always endeavor to level the playing
field, but we can't distort the rules, lower the standards, or
hobble some of the players and remain true to Martin's dream or the
dream of our forefathers whom Martin appealed to. You don't address
evil with evil, but with good. You don't create equality by imposing
inequality. You can never guarantee outcomes, only opportunities.
Remediation is preparatory in nature, so the formerly unprepared can
compete, but how well they compete is up to them. That is the nature
and nobility of character and it is on the character of its citizens
that a nation rises or falls.
Yes, compassion should exist, for some will always
need it, but compassion is by its nature an act of character and can
never be codified into fixed formulae or law, since character, and
as a result compassion, is the substance of individual persons. The
character of a nation is bound by the character of its individual
citizens, not apart from them.
I have a dream and that dream is that all men, who
have been created equal by their creator, would become people of
character and treat their fellow men with equality, expecting only a
level playing field to expend their efforts. If that were true, then
I believe both Martin and I would be satisfied that the dream that
began as America would be on the road to becoming what its founders
intended. 1-19-04
1-13-04
Bullies - There is a new study out from UCLA that says
bullies, contrary to prevailing wisdom, do not suffer from low self
esteem, but instead, according to Jaana Juvonen, lead author of the
study, are popular and feel good about themselves. "They don't show
any signs whatsoever of depression, loneliness or anxiety," Juvonen
said. "They look even healthier than the socially adjusted kids who
are not involved in the bullying." The respect they get from the
general student population arises from the fact that students do not
sympathizing with victims. Teenagers tend to respect those who show
dominance.
Finally, we see research that bears out what even
the casual observer sees in schools, neighborhoods, and anywhere
children gather in groups. It is a universal given that having power
makes you feel good about yourself, at least for a while. During the
raging hormones period of adolescence, few of the downsides of
bullying become evident, at least in a generally restrained society,
which puts limits on really excessive behavior. However, as our
moral and social climate loses the restraints that religion and
personal responsibility within community used to demand, the limits
get pushed further and further out, until they become meaningless
and bullying behavior becomes not just the painful experience of the
past, but dangerous and even lethal.
As the self-discipline that Christianity placed on
social interaction, under fire from humanistic triumphalism, melts
from the public sphere, where does the "new mankind" think the
necessary restraints on human behavior are going to come from? If
there is no God, and we are no more than the most evolved animals on
food chain, what is there to stop us from behaving like the dominant
animals we are told we are? Don't these people realize that
throughout the history of humanity, only religion has succeeded in
reigning in humanity's baser impulses, and only Christianity
has succeeded in giving true dignity to life itself? No, bullies have no
problems with self esteem, and they will have no problems refining
their baser natures now that the internal restraints of religion
have been removed from the playing field. As the prophet
Hosea warned, "For
they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind." 1-13-04
1-11-04
Renovation - We are remodeling our old,
old, house. First we gut a small section and then fix what we can,
trying not to let the dirt, dust, and the efforts needed to move
things around or bring materials in and out destroy the rest of the
house in the process. While it would be so much easier to have moved
out and gutted the whole thing at once, that wasn't an option
financially. Instead we are approaching our house like God
approaches our lives, fixing one aspect at a time. So from my
perspective, remodeling and sanctification have many things in
common. Both engender a certain amount of impatience, the desire to
finish the job and get the messiness of reconstruction out of the
way. However, just like you have to take your time and be
careful not to miss anything that needs doing when you rip the
plaster off the walls of an old house, you have to be careful to
address what is the real sin when God exposes the bare desires of
your heart to the light of day. If the foundational work in each
aspect of these efforts isn't done right, the mistakes and
out-of-true elements will distort everything that you build either
out from or on top of them. In construction nothing replaces sound
structural work, and in our spiritual lives, nothing replaces sound
biblical understanding and theology. Yes it takes time to do things
right, but the results are worth the effort, and a slipshod job will
always show through to remind you of what you should have done. In
both remodeling and sanctification dedication and attention to
detail pays off. 1-11-04
1-5-04
Pride - Emerson argued that pride always
injures ("No man ever had a point of pride that wasn't injurious to
him."). Maybe not immediately, but eventually pride, to quote
Proverbs 16:18, goes before the fall. It is pride that helps
elevate, exacerbating the fall in the first place. The apostle Paul
had a cure for pride, "For by the grace given me I say to every one
of you: Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but
rather think of yourself with sober judgment, in accordance with the
measure of faith God has given you." (Romans 12:3) Sober judgment,
now that is good advice. We could all use a little more sober
judgment, a little less pride, and definitely a few less damaging
falls, especially as we get older. The older we get the harder it is
to recover and the price of pride becomes increasingly expensive.
So, examine yourselves and evaluate the extent of your pride before
it produces a new fall, then work to reduce it. That's it, we all
need to go on a diet and shed more than a few of those pounds of
pride. The time to start is now. Right now. I mean it. Right this
very minute. 1-5-04
12-30-03
Resolutions - It is that time of year
again when we make promises to ourselves, to our family, and if we
are religious, we may also make promises to God, about the things we
want to change or do in the coming year. No one is quite sure how
the practice started, but it has become an integral part of our
culture's yearly ritual.
However, our attitude towards the attempts are
often similar to what George Stephanopolous said about President
Clinton. "The president has kept all of the promises he intended to
keep." As Jesus said about his disciples, sleeping in the garden the
night before his crucifixion, "The spirit is willing, but the body
is weak." (Matthew
26:41) Our intentions do not always live up to reality.
There is an admonition attributed to St. Francis
of Assissi, which was put into a song for the movie Brother Sun,
Sister Moon, that goes "Do few things but do them well, take
your time, go slowly." I think Francis offered those of us making
New Year's resolutions good advice. It is better to succeed at a few
things done well than make many failed promises.
One last thought to those considering making a
promise to God this new year. God expects us to keep our vows.
Deuteronomy 23:21-23 says, "If you make a vow to the LORD your God,
do not be slow to pay it, for the LORD your God will certainly
demand it of you and you will be guilty of sin. But if you refrain
from making a vow, you will not be guilty. Whatever your lips utter
you must be sure to do, because you made your vow freely to the LORD
your God with your own mouth." God keeps his promises; he expects us
to keep ours.
Happy New Year. May you succeed in keeping all
your promises. 12-30-03
12-24-03
Happy whatever -
I wanted to wish everyone a merry Christmas and a
happy new year BUT I was advised that I might get sued by somebody
SO here is the best I could come up with..
Please accept with no obligation, implied or
implicit, our best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially
responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration
of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable
traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular
practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular
persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to
practice religious or secular traditions at all.
In addition, please also accept our best wishes for
a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically
uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted
calendar year 2004, but not without due respect for the calendars of
choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped
make this country great (not to imply that this country is necessarily
greater than any other country or area of choice), and without regard
to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or
sexual orientation of the wishers.
This wish is limited to the customary and usual good
tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a
subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first. "Holiday" is not
intended to, nor shall it be considered, limited to the usual
Judeo-Christian celebrations or observances, or to such activities of
any organized or ad hoc religious community, group, individual or
belief (or lack thereof).
Note: By accepting this greeting, you are accepting
these terms. This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal,
and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher at any time, for
any reason or for no reason at all. This greeting is freely
transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. This
greeting implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of
the wishes for the wisher her/himself or others, or responsibility for
the consequences which may arise from the implementation or non-
implementation of it.
This greeting is void where prohibited by law.
12-24-03 (from an email I received today)
12-22-03
Anger - While not in an of itself evil,
for even God gets angry, anger is the most emotionally powerful
weapon in our personal arsenal and like all powerful things is
subject to easy corruption. At the heart of Tolkien's story of the
Ring, now wonderfully manifest in Peter Jackson's movie masterpiece,
The Return of the King, is the knowledge of the corrupting
nature of power. From Eve's temptation in the garden to the daily
temptations of our everyday lives, the corrupting nature of of power
lies close at hand, and the power of anger tempts us all. It is
important to note that Paul in his letter to the
Ephesians warns "In your anger do not sin: Do not let the sun go
down while you are still angry, and do not give the devil a
foothold." Even our righteous anger can easily become the foothold
of the enemy in our life, as it is difficult to control the power of
such an all encompassing emotion. Anger that spans the night into
several days quickly becomes entrenched as seething rage, an ire
that overruns the bounds of its original intent and spreads its
infection throughout our person. That is why Paul's advice is so
crucial, even to righteous anger, but especially to sinful anger,
which by its very nature already has established a beachhead for the
enemy in our person. The solution is forgiveness, of the cause,
whether person or thing, and of ourselves for what we let it do to
us. Forgiveness is the Balm of Gilead on the sore of our anger, able
to cleanse the wound before it festers and corrupts everything it
touches. So, treat your anger as the dangerous loaded weapon it is,
a weapon that only God can wield without sin over time. 12-22-03
12-17-03
Kings - In our modern democratic societies
kings are anachronisms, and where they can exist, as in England,
they are primarily symbolic. This week, one of the most anticipated
movies in recent memory opens, The Return of the King, the
third and final installment of the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
The reviews are as spectacular as the film must be (I have not seen
it yet), but aside from the technical and cinematic achievements of
Peter Jackson's adaptation of Tolkien's novel, there is something
remarkable about the concept of a king returning to his rightful
throne as one of the main streams of the story line. While on one
hand it goes against modernity and our individualistic grain, on the
other hand there is an ennobling heroism to Aragorn leading the
kingdom of men in a last ditch stand against the advance of absolute
evil. Our modern democratic and socialist societies lack true
heroes, people of bedrock character who step up to the demands of
history and the moment. Instead, we get celebrities along with movie
and pop stars, certainly not heroes. And since we have emasculated
our military leaders with straightjackets of political correctness,
athletics is the last venue to approach the genetic memory of true
heroism for us, but pursuit of money and the selfishness of the
modern athlete dissipate even that remaining shadow of our longings.
There is something fundamental about looking to heroic leadership,
about the idea of the noble king. That is because it reflects a type
of Christ, the Everlasting King of the coming Kingdom of God. We
sometimes forget that heaven is not a democracy, but a theocracy
lead by the King of Kings, but something deep in our hearts
remembers and is stirred by the image of a noble king taking a
heroic stand, even if only in a story. It still strikes a
sympathetic cord in the music of our souls. 12-17-03
12-14-03
Form - It is axiomatic in design that form
follows function. While there may be differences between two
designs, sometimes aesthetic and sometimes due to a unique approach,
the form still demonstrates its suitability to its function. The
human body exhibits this basic principal throughout: hands grasp,
teeth chew, eyes see, ears hear, feet walk, and so forth. It is only
in the area of human sexuality that people attempt to deviate from
this universal concept. It is obvious that those following
"alternate lifestyles" are breaking these basic rules and are
deviating from normality, breaking the form/function relationship,
and are not following a naturally alternate way of being. All
arguments for same sex relationships have to deal with this basic
fact. However, they don't, they avoid the issue, since it reminds
them of their attempts to square the circle. It never ceases to
amaze me how our fallen human natures will cling so tenaciously to
anything, anything at all except the obvious truth. The essence of
repentance requires admitting you are wrong and maybe that's it,
they are just not willing to be wrong, especially after they have
made such a fundamental choice to deviate their lives at such an
elemental level. What else can explain the self-serving and fatuous
arguments glibly avoiding the elephant in the corner, in a failed
attempt to extricate the blood of normality from the stone of
deviancy. For Christians, the additional fact that Eve was created
from Adam to explicitly complete an essential part of the human
equation while also foreshadowing the relationship between Christ
and the Church brings the form/function argument into the spiritual
sphere. So, on some deep level, sexual deviancy is really an attack
on God as creator and designer and a corruption of the foreshadowing
of our relationship with Christ. 12-14-03
12-10-03
Ritual - The rites, services, and
ceremonies that make up the liturgy of our lives. I have recently
noticed that as human beings we are steeped in ritual. Left to our
own devices we will soon devise rituals to give our lives a sense of
continuity and purpose. They are the well-worn paths that give
guidance to the course of life, both religious and secular. For some
it is Sunday football, others Sunday Eucharist and for a few both.
Historically, both Israel and the Church were imbued with ritual by
God, to give His people the comfort and guidance of the familiar and
to aid them in surviving times of upheaval and turmoil. But while
rituals form a useful and necessary support structure to sacred
living, in and of themselves they are spiritually useless as
evidenced by God's rejection of mere ritual in Psalm 51:16-17 "You
do not delight in sacrifice, or I would bring it; you do not take
pleasure in burnt offerings. The sacrifices of God are a broken
spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise."
Rituals only have meaning when we pour our hearts into their
supporting structure or the rituals are empty and without
sustainable meaning. This is true for all rituals, secular and
sacred. Sitting at a football game without having your heart in the
game and rooting for your team is like going to church as a
perfunctory exercise while keeping your heart distant from God.
Liturgy is only dead because the heart that should inform it has
long ago passed on. However, ritual imbued with heart and deep
commitment is a riverbed filled to overflowing with life giving
sustenance. Are your rituals empty or filled with life? 12-10-03
12-09-03
TRUTH - There is a theme that runs as an
undercurrent in all of my reading these days. Whether it be opinion
pieces, commentary, punditry, or just plain old folks, the
undergirding issue is the loss of TRUTH. Not truth or Truth, both of
which, while carrying some degree of intrinsic power in their innate
self-referencing, are human constructs and predisposed to the
subjective distortions of venal human thinking. As a Christian, I
always see those efforts corrupted by the fallen nature of all
humankind, even among people who have put on the new man in
salvation through Jesus Christ. Yes, wood, hay, and stubble are used
by even the redeemed to build houses of straw. By TRUTH I mean the
fundamental absolutes that proceed directly from God, who alone
arbitrates their meaning. We can only apprehend the meaning of those
TRUTHS through divine revelation combined with a renewed mind, which
is found only in those who are willing to submit their bodies as
living sacrifices to God (see
Romana 12:1-4). God's TRUTH is foolishness to the natural man,
but even those in total rebellion have been enlightened by God's
true light; so it is there, informing their conscience, whispering
its still small voice against the tide of their insolence. In this
wholesale abandonment of first things nothing has really changed.
Going back to the first sin in Eden the issue was the
trustworthiness of God's TRUTH, the veracity of His revealed Word.
It is no different today. Whether from the manipulations of the
homosexual lobby inside the Church and the obfuscation of those in
authority who support their cause, to the arguments of secular men
like
Robert Reich who attack Christianity at every turn in the public
sphere, God's TRUTH is rejected and man's truth/Truth is elevated as
the guiding principle for all worthy thought and action. This
politically correct, self-referencing humanistic construct is always
subjective and relative, changing with the needs of those in power
and the demands of the existential moment. While rooted in the
enlightenment, it finds its fruition in the modern
deconstructionist's abandonment of intrinsic meaning and all
absolutes as it trumpets its intellectual bankruptcy as virtue. The
inalienable rights of mankind in Western Culture find their
foundations in God's revealed TRUTH. Remove that and rights become
the consent of the power elite, without meaning or valid precedence
and the door is thrown open to the final solution, the execution of
God and all those who believe in Him and His TRUTH.
W. B. Yeats was indeed prophetic when he penned his burning
question
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
What rough beast indeed. 12-9-03
12-03-03
Choice - Some of you may
remember the outrage last Christmas produced by the Planned
Parenthood "Choice on Earth" holiday card and campaign, which
included t-shirts, bumper stickers, window stickers, and
refrigerator magnets. The campaign was so successful that they have
rolled it out again for this holiday season. Over the years, since
the Rowe versus Wade decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, choice has
become the euphemism of choice (pun intended) for abortion. You
could just as easily say "Abortion on Earth" and be accurate to the
intent of the Planned Parenthood message. However, in the war of
ideas, which are most easily driven by propaganda and simplistic
slogans, abortion carries negative images which accurately reflect
its essential meaning of termination, while choice carries positive
images of freedom and the exercise of basic "rights." This positive
image is fostered by the additional phrasing on the Planned
Parenthood holiday card of "Justice
on Earth. Human Rights on Earth. Equality on Earth. Civil Rights on
Earth. Women's Health on Earth. Freedom on Earth. Religious Rights
on Earth. Choice on Earth." Despite that, as Shakespeare so aptly
said, "a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet," meaning
that changing the name doesn't change anything of substance. A shoat
is still a pig, and abortion by any other name is still the
termination of life. The "Holiday Season" as modern secularists like
to call the period between the Christian celebrations of
Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Epiphany is really a time of
celebration for the gift of life, especially the newborn life of
Jesus Christ, the Lord and Savior of all creation.
So, in the spirit
of true "Choice on Earth" I would remind Christians everywhere that
if you call Christ Lord and you have been born again into the family
of God, then you have made a choice, a choice to follow life instead
of death, righteousness instead of evil, and you can celebrate
"Choice on Earth" as the time when all humanity faces the same
choice, to approach the babe in Bethlehem either like the Wise men
of the time, and bow your knee in adoration to the King of Creation
or instead choose to be like Herod and try to remove his unwanted
presence by attempting to terminate or should I say abort his
existence. Make your choice. 12-03-03
11-30-03
Advent - In Western liturgical churches
the annual church year begins with Advent, the first Sunday of which
is today, November 30, 2003. It is a time of preparation, both for
the anniversary of our Lord’s birth at Bethlehem and in anticipation
of his glorious second coming. Like Lent, the period before Easter,
Advent is marked by a period of reflection and repentance in
anticipation of joyous celebration, this time as we revere the
unparalleled entry of God into His creation as the Word made flesh,
Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
The heart of Advent is represented by John the
Baptist's cry to “Prepare the way of the Lord.” Answering this
ancient call we as Christians are challenged to prepare our hearts
for the advent of the Son of God and to renew again our pilgrimage
into the heart of God. To do so, we don’t only ask ourselves, “What
have we done?” and react accordingly, we also ask ourselves, “What
then should we do?” as we live out the reality of the Son’s presence
in our personal and corporate lives.
So, as you encounter and hopefully participate in
this season of Advent, may the Love of God in His Son, Jesus Christ,
be born anew in your hearts and minds, and may that love bear its
bounteous fruits of righteous in your life, my life, and the life of
the whole of the Christian Church in the coming year. 11-30-03
11-27-03
Thanksgiving - Very few people wish me
Happy Thanksgiving any more. From happy turkey day to happy holiday,
people are avoiding the word thanksgiving. Maybe it's because the
concept of giving thanks is related to prayer and God, with synonyms
being grace, blessing, and benediction, each of which is overtly
spiritual. That appears to be a problem to our overtly secular, post
Christian culture. Well, I want to wish everyone viewing these pages
a Happy Thanksgiving, full of grace and blessing, and I hope it
leaves them with a sense of benediction, of intimate contact with
the God who has granted them the bounty they enjoy. Thank you God!
11-27-03
11-25-03
Preference - In the article "The
Episcopalian Preference" in
First Things magazine, Philip Turner introduces the concept
of preference as the driving principal of modern liberalism and as
such, the undergirding theology of the liberal elites of the
Episcopal Church. Gone are the prescriptive absolutes of classical
Christianity, which when broken lead to what we commonly call sin,
and instead we have choices rooted in preferences. Some may think
that this shift in Episcopal spirituality is new, but Turner argues
that it is much older, finding its first public expression in the
church's attempt to deal with the heresy of Bishop Pike 37 years
ago. After much waffling by the House of Bishops, all they could
agree on, according to Turner, was that Pike was guilty of "a
certain degree of irresponsibility and a lack of tact rather than
false doctrine." Rather than being castigated, "Bishop Pike was
viewed not negatively, as a heretic, but positively, as 'a casualty
of the Christian mission in our day.'” Church leadership actually
had the audacity to say “We believe it is more important to be a
sympathetic and self-conscious part of God’s action in the secular
world than it is to defend the positions of the past, which is a
past that is altered by each new discovery of truth.” Turner
believes that the church's action in the Pike case was the "birth of
the notion that episcopal office is to be used as a 'prophetic'
lever to pry people loose from the encrusted positions of the past."
In other words, preference was poised to replace the absolutes of
historic Christianity as the guiding theological principal of the
new Episcopal "prophetic lever", to be wielded by bishops as a means
of engaging the surrounding liberal cultural ethos and incorporating
it into the church. Until the recent ordination of Gene Robinson, a
practicing homosexual, as Bishop of New Hampshire, John Shelby Spong
was the foremost change agent of the new agenda. In 1973, the
psychiatrist Karl Menninger lamented in a book of the same title, "Whatever
Became of Sin?" We now have our answer. It has been replaced by
preference, the end result of the "You're OK, I'm OK" epistemology,
and if not checked by a resurgent Christianity, will lead to the
fulfillment of C. S. Lewis's prophetic warning in
The Abolition of Man. 11-25-03
11-23-03
Sunday - Sunday is a day unlike any other
during the week. Everyone enjoys its uniqueness in one way or
another. While most Christians attend church services, taking time
to remember God and substantively interact with family, and
secularists enjoy a day somewhat free of the demands of work, we all
have a chance to at least get some rest so we can recuperate and
prepare for the week ahead. The reason for this scheduled break in
the hustle of daily life is wholly due to our Judeo-Christian
heritage. The Jewish Sabbath and the Christian Sunday informed the
foundations of Western Civilization with the fundamental right of
all people to stop the wheel of labor and belay the incessant
demands of "doing", of rushing to and fro, and instead to take some
time to just "be." Even thought the sanctity of this period of rest
has eroded over the last century as postmodern, post Christian life
once more took on the incessant demands of 24X7 living, there is
still enough of a residual effect for its call to resonate deep
within our souls. No, Sunday is still unique, even if it has only
become a shadow of what it was meant to be. 11-23-03
11-17-03
Sin - A transgression of a religious or moral
law, especially when deliberate. It is a word that has been out of
favor for some time, even from church pulpits, where at one time it
was a staple of honest oratory. One sermon on sin even became a
classic, Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners
in the Hands of an Angry God". By 1973 sin was so out of fashion
that the sociologist of religion Karl Menninger would write the book
"Whatever
Became of Sin" where he lamented that sins were replace by
crimes or symptoms. Where once priests preached and counseled, now
the legal or psychological systems demand precedence. But while
police arrest, judges incarcerate, and psychologists treat, they
cannot forgive. As to the angry God, he (or she depending on your
proclivity) is definitely out; God is now all luv, luv, luv, and
especially solicitous of the same-gendered variety. The idea that
God would ever judge someone with the archaic concept of sin, well
it just isn't done. After all, we have redefined it out of
existence. The problem is that in doing so we have fallen to the
original sin, the first sin. The serpent tempted Eve with the
ability to judge for herself good and evil, to know and define for
herself what was sin. What has changed? Whether you are Griswold,
the
Episcopal Presiding Bishop, or Kim Gandy, president of
NOW,
or a myriad of others in modern leadership positions, you have taken
the bait and feel it is your right and duty to define away sin. It
appears there is only one sin left, that of intolerance, primarily
defined as taking a position against the actions that used to be
called sin. Isn't the serpent proud of himself? 11-17-03
10-28-03
Persistence of evil - There is one
overriding quality about evil, it never quits. It may give up an
avenue of attack, but it is always searching for a new angle, a new
line of assault. In one sense, evil is the futility and decay that
Paul talks about infecting creation in Romans 8:20 as the universe
awaits the culmination of history and its chance to be brought into
the glorious freedom of the children of God. Until then, evil is
doggedly persistent, but not because of any warped moral virtue,
instead as the negation of what is good, and right, and true, and as
the inbuilt frustration and uselessness of all our striving coming
out of Eden's debacle. Therefore evil will be ever with us,
collecting the fallen, those who have given up and surrendered to
it, until God has completed His work of redemption. That is why
being a disciplined, doggedly persistent follower of Jesus Christ
should be the primary goal of all who call themselves Christian.
10-28-03
10-22-03
Simplicity - As I look around my
environment, I have realized that I am awash with stuff; big stuff,
little stuff, old stuff, new stuff, and all the stuff that fits in
between. I was reading an article today that said our digestive
systems have not been able to acclimate to the calorie-dense food we
eat today. We are still programmed for an agrarian environment in
which foods had considerably less nutrient density. We are being
overwhelmed with too much foodstuffs and as a result we are all
getting fat. Well I would like to point out that we are not just
getting physically fat, but we have also gotten other stuff fat. My
house started out as a two room cabin in the early 1800's with about
450 square feet. In the early 1900's a front L and second floor were
added bringing the size to about 1200 square feet. We have
considered several additions and rebuilds that would create about
2400 square feet of space. Why? We need space for all of our stuff.
Also we like to entertain and to get 8-10 people in for an evening
means more space, since like stuff, people need space. Lately, my
wife and I are trying to rethink our needs and get rid of some of
our stuff. The problem becomes, which stuff; what to keep and what
to jettison? But then the nagging refrain echoes within our brain,
"What if I need this next week, or next month, or maybe next year?"
Oh, Lord, rescue me from all this stuff! 10-22-03
10-15-03
Striving - In Martin Luther's great hymn
A Mighty Fortress is Our God there is a verse that says "Did we
in our own strength confide, our striving would be losing." One of
the issues in the rugged individualism that undergirds the American
ethos is that individually striving or struggling to better yourself
by your own efforts is foundational to a successful life. In many
ways this ethos has also permeated American Christianity, especially
protestant Christianity. While much of our striving is indeed
biblical (e.g., study to show yourself approved, resist the devil
and he will flee, straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward
the goal), those personal efforts, rooted deeply in the foundations
of personal responsibility, are, if not supported by an absolute
reliance upon God working within us, an anathema to the historic
faith once delivered unto the saints. Some see it as a paradox,
others an antinomy, but Paul dealt with the balance best when in
Philippians 2:12b-13 he said "...continue to work out your salvation
with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and
to act according to his good purpose." No man is an island,
especially no Christian, for it is in God that we live and move and
have our being, as Paul so ably argued at the
Areopagus. The question then is to learn how to strive to the
uttermost while at the same time having absolute reliance upon God.
Oh yeah! 10-15-03
10-08-03
Rest - God said we should rest. For Israel, He
even made it into a commandment regarding the Sabbath. In ancient
times, rest meant having time to think; it didn't mean the
recreation or sports or entertainment that we jam into our moments
of "rest" today. When you rest, you put up your feet, relax, and
allow the noise to quiet down, letting yourself hear the still small
voice of God. Modern Christians have lost the quiet rest concept
that our earlier spiritual brothers and sisters took for granted. In
doing so we have lost our ability to hear anything drowned in the
blaring cacophony fighting for attention around us. I would argue we
have lost our ability to hear God's normal voice. He must then
resort to more extreme methods to get our attention (e.g., see
Hebrew 12). We need to recapture fundamental Christian rest. We need
to do it soon. 10-8-03
9-22-03
Happiness - Externally induced happiness
is like deodorant, it only covers over what is really underneath,
which is why people seeking happiness through external means are
doomed to failure. Deodorant always wears off; eventually you have
to wash. The key is doing the things that build joy and and a
positive outlook on the inside, in the center of your soul. That can
only be done with an ongoing and maturing relationship with Jesus
Christ. The Apostle Paul was only able to say that he counted all of
his past as fecal matter because attaining Christ was the source of
his joy (see
Philippians 3:8-11). The vagaries of external things no longer
defined him or controlled his reality. Ground your search for
happiness in the reality of Jesus Christ and you will find peace and
rest for your soul and your life. 9-22-03
9-18-03
Hurricane Isabel - During
times of danger and when "acts of God" such as storms and hurricanes
exert their force upon our homes, we need to remember who it is that
controls all things, even numbering the hairs on our heads.
Psalm 55:8 "I would hurry to my place
of shelter, far from the tempest and storm."
Luke 8:25 "Where is your faith?" he asked his disciples. In
fear and amazement they asked one another, "Who is this? He commands
even the winds and the water, and they obey him."
Matthew 16:2-3 "He replied, 'When evening comes, you say, "It
will be fair weather, for the sky is red,: and in the morning,
"Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast." You know
how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret
the signs of the times.'" 9-18-03
9-17-03
Repentance -
Balzac, considered the greatest French novelist, said in his
novel The Human Comedy "Remorse is impotence; it will sin
again. Only repentance is strong; it can end everything." So true,
since without repentance nothing really changes. The apostle Paul
knew this also. In 2 Corinthians 7:10 he said "For godly sorrow
produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but
the sorrow of the world produces death." Why is it that we resist so
strongly the one thing that would allow us to put our past behind us
and give us the hope of a truly better future? On this existential
moment the life and death of a soul turns. 9/17/03
9-04-03
Twaddling - There seems to be a run on
foolish, trivializing comparisons in the social-political dialog of
the day. Bush is compared with Hitler and the United States with
Nazi Germany, which trivializes the Holocaust, since the proffered
sins of the president and our nation are truly insignificant by
comparison. Twaddling, while being justified by some as hyperbole, only
demonstrates the severe propagandic nature that our public discourse
has fallen into. Twaddling also leaves truth as its first casualty
and advances a sense of despair in the body politic, since if those
who would lead us have lost all sense of proportion and logic, what
hope is there for any of us? 9/04/03
9-02-03
Compromise - This is one of those rare
words that can mean something good or something evil depending on
the context. At the root of the word's problem is whether we can
find a valid ethical and moral purpose for our negotiation and
whether what we are thinking about giving up will not alter the
valid moral and ethical requirements of our position. In the Book of
Revelation God makes an interesting assessment of most of the
churches of Asia. Over and over He commends them on their faith,
their remaining true to His name, but in every occurrence but one He
holds something against them. What He condemns them for is
compromise; in one form or another each church He praises has also
ceded a portion of its integrity to the enemy. Only one church,
Smyrna, escapes God's judgment for compromise, and they are the
church who is under persecution. God makes it very clear, we cannot
dance with devil and dance with Him at the same time. 9-02-03
8-29-03
Sadness - Feeling out of sorts,
particularly in a way that brings on feelings of being alone, even
when in a crowd, and of being weighed down by an event or events. I
am sad today, very sad. After twenty seven years of attending one
church as my primary connection to the family of God, I now see its
end approaching. It is a strange time. For some of those around me
it is just a new beginning, a chance for a clean start. For others,
it is just another change, like finding some clothes they like just
as much or even better. Yet there are others who are adamant that
nothing will be different, and they will hold on to the bitter end.
At the moment, sadness reigns for me and there is nothing to
mitigate the depths of its intensity. 8-29-03
8-21-03
Travel - Basically going from one place to
another. Travel has always been risky, especially for the common
man. But over the course of history and civilization it has gotten
safer. It probably reached its peak of safety (on average for all
travel) a few years ago, before the current climate of terrorism.
Air travel's only real threat is terrorism and even though you touch
30,000 plus feet at one point in your journey it is the safest way
to move from place to place. The most common method, driving, has
probably gotten to be about as safe as it is going to get until some
serious technological breakthroughs. After side air bags and crumple
zones there is not a lot left until computerized accident avoidance
systems become practical. Why am I talking about travel? Well I am
about to make a round trip between Baltimore and Tallahassee,
Florida to move my wife home from a contract job she has been
working on. I will be driving a pickup truck (the least safe road
vehicle) almost 2000 miles over the next four days. Think of me when
you say your prayers today. 8-21-03
8-18-03
Syncretism - When an attempt is made to blend
or fuse outside ideas with an existing religious system we call the
effort syncretism. It is endemic to religion that syncretism will be
attempted. The religious system then has to either fight off the
attempt or find some way to accommodate the new ideas. Some
religions are inherently syncretistic, such as Hinduism. Various
expression of Hinduism have had no problem absorbing external
deities, such as when the Krishna's call Jesus one of the many
avatars of god. Christianity, however, has always fought syncretism,
seeing it as a corruption of the revealed truth of God. However,
syncretism is not always the absorption of other deities, it can
also be the inclusion of foreign philosophies. It is not without
purpose that the early church father Tertullian asked, "What has
Athens to do with Jerusalem?" That question appears lost today as
the cry instead seems to be "How can Athens and Jerusalem get
along?" 8-18-03
8-13-03
Crucifixion - Who is responsible for Jesus'
death? This is not a question that can adequately dealt with in a
short reflection. However, while it is clear that the Romans
crucified him, they did not initiate the proceeding and Pontius
Pilate sought several times to release him, but was unable for fear
of a riot.
Why am I asking this question? A great furor has
arisen over a new movie, The Passion, made by Mel Gibson about the
crucifixion of Jesus Christ. He and the movie are being accused of
being anti-Semitic because in following the Gospels, the blame for
Jesus' death is laid at the feet of the Jewish rulers and by proxy,
all Jews. While I will have much more to say on this later in a
fully developed article, a present day Jew is no more responsible
for Jesus' crucifixion than I, as a white, Anglo-Saxon protestant am
for early American slavery or a baby born today in Berlin is
responsible for the holocaust. So to use the movie as an excuse for
anti-Semitism is rude, crude, and without merit. That said, to try
and say that the Jewish authorities were not directly responsible
for Jesus' death is historically inaccurate. They were. More on this
later. 8-13-03
8-12-03
Racial
Preferences - An interesting analogy to the debate about racial
preferences is the concept of starting a car. When the engine is
cold the choke gives preference to fuel over air intake so that the
engine can successfully start up. As the engine warms up, the choke
slowly opens until no longer exerts any preference to the fuel.
Racial preferences are like a choke to a cold engine, arguably
necessary to get things started. But, if they are left in place they
choke the engine, preventing it from running properly, possibly
evening stalling it. The choke is only a temporary measure and so
should be racial preferences. Other measures are much more efficient
in making the engine run efficiently. The real question is does the
choke now need to be opened. We may have waited so long that the
engine already stalling. 8-12-03
Liberalism - The fundamental view that
people are basically good and it is the systems and institutions
that distort and corrupt people and their decisions. So, you fix the
world by changing the institutions and the systems and then the
people will be free to be their "good" selves.
This is fundamentally opposed by Western
Judeo-Christian thinking that says people are inherently flawed with
an innate tendency toward evil. As a result, people must be taught
to do the right thing (becoming civilized) and therefore we set up
institutions and systems of laws and punishment to restrain evil,
which lurks just below the surface in us all.
On one hand institutions and systems are bad,
people are good. On the other hand people are bad and institutions
and systems only reflect the people who control them. Who is right?
Any fair student of history knows that the fundamental premise of
liberalism is wrong and the basic premise of Judeo-Christian thought
has been proved right over and over again.
Some people consider liberalism a child-like view
of the world that is primarily driven by emotion. That is why
feelings and compassion are high on the liberal list and character
is not. Character is driven by decisions and an adherence to an
external ethical system, which requires maturity and responsibility,
two things distinctly un child-like. 8-12-03
7-20-03
Routine - Numerous routines make up the rhythm of our daily
lives and the older we get the more important those regular
reoccurrences become. As children we embrace novelty and if the course
of the day is too regular we scream boredom. But as we age we depend
on the cadence of comfortable routine to help us feel grounded. That
doesn't mean we are opposed to change, but a certain structure is
important for our sense of well being. When the balanced passage of
our life is interrupted, whether by illness or radical change, such as
being laid off from work, we are suddenly out of whack, things seem
distorted, and we tend to drift. Work and the routines it weaves
through our life are important components of our sense of balance. I
have, due to recent events, come to appreciate those routines and look
back at them with longing. Radical change is hard.
7-08-03
Pain - Our universal desire to avoid pain is well attested by
the extensive lineup of analgesics found in any supermarket. From
general aches and pains to the ubiquitous headache, we seek relief by
consuming millions of pills and capsules daily. But pain serves an
important purpose. It is a biological warning system. It alerts us
that something is wrong or out of whack or injured, or in the case of
surgical interventions, is in the delicate process of healing. Pain
puts us in a quandary. We need pain, while at the same time we need to
alleviate it. Such a delicate balance, pain management. Like most
things in life, pain is best in moderation, as are our attempts to
mitigate it. Why is pain on my mind? I recently had a surgical hernia
repaired and its location makes almost any movement painful. They gave
me pills that only take the sharp edge off the pain, which is good,
since there has to be enough remaining pain to prevent me from
damaging the healing process. Balance. Not too much, not too little.
Aren't most things in life like that?
7-02-03
Patriotism - As July 4th approaches and we think about our
independence as a nation, patriotism comes to the fore and all
thinking Christians need to remind themselves of what God has to say
on this important subject. Along those lines I would ask you to
remember Paul's words to the Philippians where in two places he says
things that should temper our uncritical patriotism. First in 3:20 he
reminds us that "...our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await
a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ..." Second in 1:7-9 he
prays an important prayer. "And this is my prayer: that your love may
abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that you
may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless
until the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that
comes through Jesus Christ--to the glory and praise of God." He
reminds us that all love, including our patriotism, requires
knowledge, insight and discernment so that it be acted upon
righteously. By all means be expressively patriotic, but also remember
that your final allegiance is to God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
6-27-03
Friends - Friendship is one of the four expressions of love
according to the Greeks, but it is unique. It is not driven by passion
like eros or a sense of family like sturgos. It does not
require sacrifice like agape though sacrifice is usually part
of its lifeblood. It doesn't need presence and it can be as immediate
after years of separation as it was before the goodbye occurred. I
guess you can say friendships are like a good pair of shoes that still
fit perfectly when the opportunity to wear them avails itself.
6-23-03
Goals - God obviously
has goals, after all, the Bible says that He has a plan and having a
plan implies having objectives and goals. Beyond the larger plan that
God has for all of creation and humanity, one of the cornerstones of
the Christian life has always been that God has a plan for you. You
are not just a nondescript cog in a larger machine. You matter
individually, "For Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated." Romans 9:13
So, logically it would appear that there are goals and objectives as
part of God's plan for our lives. Didn't Jesus explain his goal for
Paul's life when he called him to be an apostle to the Gentiles? Well
then, what do you think God's goal for your life is? I think mine is
to become an effective writer and use that to further the Christian
witness.
6-21-03
Alibis - Eric Hoffer complained that alibis are more attractive
than achievements because achievements require you to continue to
produce to meet expectations, while alibis free you from ever having
to produce since you have an excuse for failure. What an insight! I
think that this insight also applies to sanctification in the
Christian life. One reason many people embrace their sinfulness is
that it is lot easier to deal with being a sinner than showing the
continual spiritual growth that sanctification requires. Being a
sinner is a good alibis for, well, being a sinner. While it is true
that we are all sinners and any man who says he is not a sinner is a
liar, we could use a few more people who struggle to put to death
whatever belongs to their carnal nature. Aren't we also called by
Jesus to "go and sin no more?"
6-17-03
Flaws - Part of our human condition is that we are all
flawed, some worse than others, but all broken in some respect. What
separates Christianity from all other religions or belief systems is
its fundamental right of forgiveness when those flaws express
themselves in unacceptable (sinful) activity. Christianity allows one
to repent and move on, to change your life for the better, to overcome
your failures. Jesus told the woman caught in adultery "neither do I
condemn you" and then to "go and sin no more." As the political season
winds up to another election cycle I am reminded that in the public
sphere nothing gets forgiven or forgotten and everything will be used
to discredit you if possible. Given a choice, I choose Christianity
every time. Politics and the public sphere give no second chances.
6-15-03
Fatherhood - Since today is Father's day I have been thinking
about fatherhood and while there are many definitions I have settled
on a practical one: a father is someone who keeps promises and honors
commitments. That appears to be to me the root out of which all the
other attributes flow. It is also the measuring rod I have begun to
use on myself in relation to my daughter. Do I keep my promises and do
I honor my commitments to her?
6-12-03
Stuff - It has come to my attention that I (we actually, but
I am seriously to blame) have too much stuff! Everywhere I turn there
are stacks of stuff, stuff in boxes, stuff on flat surfaces, stuff
filling drawers. It is in the attic, the shed out back, in a storage
facility I rent; it is everywhere. Arrrgghhhhh!!! By this I don't mean
the essentials of my daily life or work. I mean accretions, sort of
like what happens to sunken items in the ocean, where things just
accumulate all over the object, obscuring the essentials. The
frustrating fact is that removing my "stuff" is just as hard as
removing the oceanic accumulations. It is very hard work and never
ending, since you no sooner free up one area that the accretions begin
anew. No wonder a lot of us long for a simpler life in a simpler time.
God have mercy on me. Please God, I mean it!
6-07/8-03
Order and Chaos - If a cluttered desk is evidence of a
cluttered mind, what is the evidence of an empty desk. Sometimes we
try to over-organize our lives, scrubbing out any disorder or chaotic
randomness. While having a baseline of discipline and order is
absolutely necessary, a modicum of disorder often leads to creative
insight and unique problem solving. Many famous advances have come
from experimental accidents. That is not to say we should purposely
introduce disorder, but on the other hand we shouldn't fear the
occasional breakdown.
6-06-03
Anxiety - Charles Spurgeon said that our anxiety does not
empty tomorrow of its sorrows, but only empties today of its strength.
A terrific insight, since without the necessary strength we don't have
the resources to deal with anything. Jesus was so right when he said
in Matthew 6:34 "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow
will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."
Notice he said "not to worry", not "not to plan". There is a
categorical difference between the two. Good advice from the source of
all sound advice.
6-05-03
Watchers - It appears that the baby boomers
(the post-WW II generation) to a large degree have become watchers.
They are spectator driven, preferring to watch, rather than to do.
Some may lay this passivity at the feet of their being the first
media-driven generation; a generation who grew up in front of
televisions and as they matured have had the financial wherewithal to
make the technological explosion of video, music, and the Internet a
integral part of their daily experience. Their energy is directed at
watching and enhancing their ability to watch. It is almost as if they
have become voyeurs rather than livers of life.
6-04-03
Risk - In the end we lose everything and can
take nothing with us but who we are. So, rather than isolating and
insulating ourselves in the fear of loss, we should push on, taking
prayerful risks, since in the end, the success or failure of
everything we do is essentially in God's hands. All we can do is act
honorably and as intelligently as possible.
6-03-03
Pacifism - In man's pristine, unfallen state
no one would have the need or desire to kill, either man or beast. But
we did fall and the echo of that former perfection still resonates
deep in our human psyche. It inexorably draws us, even though it is
now corrupted by sin and its purity is unattainable; it is twisted
into a trap and used by Satan to make us lambs for the slaughter.
[top]